Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A50 and NVIDIA Quadro M6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A50
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 988 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 2350 MHz vs 1114 MHz
- 703.1x more texture fill rate: 150.4 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 21 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 988 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz vs 1114 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s vs 213.9 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M6000
- 3x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 6612 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 722 vs 613
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11768 vs 5222
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 39510 vs 33127
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 722 vs 613 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11768 vs 5222 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 39510 vs 33127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A50
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M6000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc Pro A50 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 | 722 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5222 | 11768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33127 | 39510 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.14 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2593.621 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.895 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 145.003 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 768.171 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13738 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13738 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A50 | NVIDIA Quadro M6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | DG2-128 | GM200 |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 21 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 252 | 251 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,199.99 | |
Price now | $2,825 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 4.69 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz | 1114 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 988 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,203 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.813 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 213.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 8,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 6,844 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 317.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 6612 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |