Intel Arc Pro A50 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel Arc Pro A50 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Arc Pro A50
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1607 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 2350 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 588x more texture fill rate: 150.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 vs 2 November 2017 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1607 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
- 2.4x more pipelines: 2432 vs 1024
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 876 vs 613
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14696 vs 5222
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 55424 vs 33127
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2432 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 876 vs 613 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14696 vs 5222 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 55424 vs 33127 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Arc Pro A50
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Arc Pro A50 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 613 | 876 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5222 | 14696 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33127 | 55424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 182.11 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1797.792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1035.984 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3638 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1471 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Arc Pro A50 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Pascal |
Code name | DG2-128 | GP104 |
Launch date | 8 Aug 2022 | 2 November 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 252 | 250 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 44.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2350 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,203 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.626 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.813 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2432 |
Pixel fill rate | 75.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 150.4 GTexel/s | 255.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 7,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 8,186 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 256.3 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |