Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 13.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 48
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 60% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1150 vs 720
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 3 January 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 640 vs 48 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1150 vs 720 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 45 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1150 | 720 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1364 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 339 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6590 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.485 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 246.614 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.888 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.014 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.981 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2306 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake) | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 3 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1142 | 1144 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Pixel fill rate | 24.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 48.00 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 / 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |