Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 210 Watt
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 14 August 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- 3.9x more core clock speed: 1156 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1471 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 4.9x more texture fill rate: 330.00 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 3584 vs 768
| Core clock speed | 1156 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1471 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 330.00 GTexel/s vs 67.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3584 vs 768 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13093 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 768 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1765.06 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.606 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.32 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14462 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1501 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 14 August 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 224 |
| Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1400 MHz | 1471 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1156 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 3584 |
| Pixel fill rate | 33.60 GPixel/s | 94.00 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 67.20 GTexel/s | 330.00 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 210 Watt |
| Compute units | 56 | |
| Floating-point performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 3584 | |
| Texture Units | 256 | |
| Transistor count | 12,500 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 410 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 2048 bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | System Shared | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) vs
AMDRadeon 780M
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Raptor Lake)
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Alder Lake) vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
