Intel Iris Graphics 5100 vs ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and ATI Radeon 9200 PRO videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 150 nm
- 247.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 742 vs 3
- Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 135
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 1 May 2003 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 150 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 742 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 vs 135 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 239 MHz vs 200 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 28 Watt vs 30 Watt
Core clock speed | 239 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 28 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 PRO
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | ATI Radeon 9200 PRO |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 742 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 268 | 135 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4028 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | ATI Radeon 9200 PRO | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | RV280 |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 1 May 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1198 | 1195 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 239 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 36 million |
Texture fill rate | 956 MTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 5.25 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 328 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |