AMD Radeon HD 8670D vs Intel Iris Graphics 5100

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon HD 8670D and Intel Iris Graphics 5100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8670D

• 4.2x more core clock speed: 844 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1980 vs 1019
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1980 vs 1019
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1668
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1668

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 32 nm
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 738 vs 533
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 187
• Around 89% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4035 vs 2136

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 8670D
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 5100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	533 738
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	187 268
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	2136 4035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1980 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1980 1019
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 1668
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3340 1668

Compare specifications (specs)