Intel Iris Graphics 5100 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 5100 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 55 nm
- 6.3x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 189 Watt
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 269 vs 96
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 vs 11 November 2008 |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 189 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 vs 96 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 610 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 6x more pipelines: 240 vs 40
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1222 vs 740
- 4.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18229 vs 4023
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3319 vs 1668
- Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3319 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 610 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 240 vs 40 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1222 vs 740 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18229 vs 4023 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3319 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3319 vs 1668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 740 | 1222 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 269 | 96 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4023 | 18229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1019 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1668 | 3319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1668 | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 5100 | NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3 | GT200B |
Launch date | 27 May 2013 | 11 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1203 | 1206 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $3,499 | |
Price now | $178.89 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.02 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 610 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 40 | 240 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 189 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |