Intel Iris Graphics 6100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 6100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1105
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1105
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 3246
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 3246
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 3246 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 1152 vs 48
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 vs 896
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 312
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8787 vs 3026
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 1139
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 1139
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2756 vs 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 vs 312 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8787 vs 3026 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 vs 1139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 vs 1139 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 896 | 2756 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 312 | 325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1105 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3026 | 8787 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1139 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1139 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3246 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GK104 |
Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1082 | 1084 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 706 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 1152 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |