Intel Iris Graphics 6100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 6100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1105
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1105
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 3246
  • Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 3246
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 5 January 2015 vs 23 July 2013
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 vs 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3331 vs 3246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3331 vs 3246

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 24x more pipelines: 1152 vs 48
  • 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2756 vs 900
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 328 vs 313
  • 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8855 vs 3026
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 1139
  • Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 1139
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 1152 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2756 vs 900
PassMark - G2D Mark 328 vs 313
Geekbench - OpenCL 8855 vs 3026
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1974 vs 1139
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1974 vs 1139

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
900
2756
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
313
328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1404
1105
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3026
8855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1139
1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1139
1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3331
3246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3331
3246
Name Intel Iris Graphics 6100 NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark 900 2756
PassMark - G2D Mark 313 328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1404 1105
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1404 1105
Geekbench - OpenCL 3026 8855
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1139 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1139 1974
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3331 3246
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3331 3246
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 24.487
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 600.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 61.984

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Graphics 6100 NVIDIA Quadro K4100M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 8.0 Kepler
Code name Broadwell GT3 GK104
Launch date 5 January 2015 23 July 2013
Place in performance rating 1082 1084
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,499
Price now $379.99
Value for money (0-100) 9.50

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 706 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 48 1152
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 3,540 million
Floating-point performance 1,627 gflops
Texture fill rate 67.78 GTexel / s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x1 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_1) 12
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 5
Vulkan

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit 256 Bit
Shared memory 1 0
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 102.4 GB / s
Memory clock speed 3200 MHz
Memory type GDDR5

Technologies

Quick Sync
3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus