Intel Iris Graphics 6100 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Graphics 6100 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1404 vs 1105
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1404 vs 1105
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 3246
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 3246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 vs 23 July 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 vs 1105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 vs 1105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 3246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 3246 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 1152 vs 48
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2736 vs 898
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 314
- 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9097 vs 3027
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1974 vs 1139
- Around 73% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1974 vs 1139
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1152 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2736 vs 898 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 vs 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9097 vs 3027 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1974 vs 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1974 vs 1139 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 898 | 2736 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1404 | 1105 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1404 | 1105 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3027 | 9097 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1139 | 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1139 | 1974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 | 3246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 | 3246 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 5 January 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1074 | 1075 |
| Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
| Price now | $379.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 706 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 1152 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,540 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Graphics 6100 with others
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6800 Ultra
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
ATIRadeon HD 5470
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 5570
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro K4100M
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M500M
IntelIris Graphics 6100 vs
IntelUHD Graphics P630
