NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs Intel Iris Graphics 6100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and Intel Iris Graphics 6100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1171 vs 900
- 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6099 vs 3025
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2174 vs 1404
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2174 vs 1404
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1729 vs 1139
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1729 vs 1139
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 April 2016 vs 5 January 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1171 vs 900 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6099 vs 3025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 vs 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 vs 1139 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 313 vs 181
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3331 vs 3122
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3331 vs 3122
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 313 vs 181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3331 vs 3122 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3331 vs 3122 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 6100
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1171 | 900 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 313 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6099 | 3025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | 1139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | 3331 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 | 3331 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro M500M | Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Launch date | 27 April 2016 | 5 January 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 1084 | 1085 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| Quick Sync | ||

