Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and NVIDIA Tesla K80m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher boost clock speed: 1150 MHz vs 876 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 20x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 300 Watt
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 17 November 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz vs 876 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- Around 87% higher core clock speed: 562 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 104x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 48
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17062 vs 6387
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17062 vs 6387 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA Tesla K80m |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6387 | 17062 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.435 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1476.444 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.764 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 198.978 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.289 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | Kepler 2.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | GK210 |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 17 November 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 814 | 805 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 876 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 562 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 2x 2496 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 300 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | Yes | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 240.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin |