Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 and AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Technologies, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Launch date | 10 July 2019 vs 13 February 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1240 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 14.7x more pipelines: 704 vs 48
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14671 vs 6387
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 527 vs 389
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2120 vs 1727
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1857 vs 1780
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1857 vs 1780
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3107 vs 2992
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3107 vs 2992
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3455 vs 2792
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3455 vs 2792
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1240 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 704 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14671 vs 6387 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 527 vs 389 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2120 vs 1727 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1857 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1857 vs 1780 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3107 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3107 vs 2992 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3455 vs 2792 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3455 vs 2792 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6387 | 14671 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 389 | 527 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1727 | 2120 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1780 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1780 | 1857 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2992 | 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2992 | 3107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2792 | 3455 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2792 | 3455 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.991 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 364.578 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.196 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.784 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 262.35 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Intel Gen. 9.5 (Coffee Lake) | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Raven |
Launch date | 10 July 2019 | 13 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 813 | 814 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1240 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 704 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,760 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 55 GTexel / s | |
Transistor count | 4,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
DisplayPort support | ||
eDP 1.2 signal support | Yes | |
HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | |
Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
Technologies |
||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
Quick Sync | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | IGP | |
Supplementary power connectors | None |