Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 150x more core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 2 MHz
- 6x more boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 48 vs 4
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- 430.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1721 vs 4
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 357 vs 173
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 15 November 2002 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz vs 2 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Pipelines | 48 vs 4 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 vs 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 vs 173 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 | 4 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | 173 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | NVIDIA GeForce4 4200 Go | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | NV28M |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 15 November 2002 |
Place in performance rating | 1031 | 1029 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 2 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 4 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | DDR |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | 128 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bus width | 200 Bit | |
Shared memory | 0 |