Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs AMD Radeon HD 7470M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 and AMD Radeon HD 7470M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1721 vs 408
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7356 vs 3322
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1884 vs 1422
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 3074
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1884 vs 1422
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 3074
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 7 January 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 vs 408 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 vs 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 vs 1422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 vs 3074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 vs 1422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 vs 3074 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7470M
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 750 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3.3x more pipelines: 160 vs 48
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 393 vs 357
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 160 vs 48 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 393 vs 357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7470M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon HD 7470M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1721 | 408 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 357 | 393 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 | 3322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.109 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.116 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.115 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 54.932 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1884 | 1422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3343 | 3074 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2780 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1884 | 1422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3343 | 3074 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 619 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 | AMD Radeon HD 7470M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT3e | Seymour |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 7 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1031 | 1034 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 800 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 750 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 48 | 160 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 7 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 370 million |
Floating-point performance | 240.0 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | DDR3 / DDR4 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 |