Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 9x more pipelines: 72 vs 8
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 256x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 256 MB
- 28.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2000 vs 70
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 360 vs 168
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 15 August 2008 |
Pipelines | 72 vs 8 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 256 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2000 vs 70 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 vs 168 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
- Around 77% higher core clock speed: 530 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 15 Watt
Core clock speed | 530 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2000 | 70 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 | 168 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 9040 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 150M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Tesla |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | G98 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 15 August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1006 | 1009 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | 8 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 210 million |
Floating-point performance | 20.8 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 2.12 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-I |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 256 MB |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |