Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- 5.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 84 Watt
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1995 vs 506
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8932 vs 3372
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.145 vs 8.915
- 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 450.087 vs 146.479
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.059 vs 1.178
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.346 vs 10.689
- 10.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 67.077 vs 6.64
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 1 June 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 84 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1995 vs 506 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8932 vs 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 vs 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 vs 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 vs 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 vs 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 vs 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3345 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 vs 361
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 vs 1668
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 vs 1668
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 vs 361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 vs 1668 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 vs 1668 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1995 | 506 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 491 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8932 | 3372 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | Haswell GT2 |
Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 1 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1008 | 1009 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 72 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 84 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |