Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 and AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 47 Watt
- 64x more maximum memory size: 64 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2846 vs 1166
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2846 vs 1166
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 vs 5 September 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 47 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 vs 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 vs 1166 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 384 vs 72
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2589 vs 1668
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4574 vs 3355
- Around 55% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2589 vs 1668
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4574 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 72 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2589 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4574 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2589 vs 1668 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4574 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2000 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 360 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9049 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 450.087 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.059 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.346 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 67.077 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2846 | 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1668 | 2589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 4574 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2846 | 1166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1668 | 2589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 4574 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 | AMD Radeon HD 8730 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Skylake GT4e | Cape Verde |
| Launch date | 1 September 2015 | 5 September 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 992 | 994 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 72 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 47 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 614.4 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 19.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580 with others
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 980 XGL
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
IntelHD Graphics P4600
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8730 OEM
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M275
IntelIris Pro Graphics 580 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 3 Mobile
