Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1245 MHz
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 17 Dec 2021 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1245 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 735 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 79.68 GTexel/s vs 62.40 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 10 nm
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 79.68 GTexel/s vs 62.40 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 10 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 480 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7753 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 43499 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Ampere |
| Code name | Raptor Lake GT1 | GA107 |
| Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 17 Dec 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 348 |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1245 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
| Pixel fill rate | 31.20 GPixel/s | 39.84 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 62.40 GTexel/s | 79.68 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 159.4 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.20 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.100 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
| Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | 113 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 112.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 8 GB
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) vs
IntelUHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 16 EU)
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake) vs
IntelUHD Graphics (Raptor Lake 64EU)
