Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs ATI Radeon X800 XT
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and ATI Radeon X800 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 6600x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 130 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 54 Watt
- 27.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2686 vs 98
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 271
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 December 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 54 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2686 vs 98 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 vs 271 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 XT
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI Radeon X800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2686 | 98 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 271 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12010 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.73 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1136.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.584 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.715 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.592 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | ATI Radeon X800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | R400 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | R423 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 December 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 626 | 623 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 130 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 54 Watt |
Transistor count | 160 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |