Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 884.1x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 16 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 377 vs 292
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 67.209
• Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.292 vs 799.414
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.572 vs 4.536
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.728 vs 30.523

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1100 MHz
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
• Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 2680
• Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17470 vs 12010
• Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 193.589
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 5609
• Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 5609

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2680 4462
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	377 292
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	12010 17470
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137.292 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.572 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.728 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	193.589 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3359

Compare specifications (specs)