Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and NVIDIA NVS 810 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1033 MHz
• 226.6x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 2x 33.06 GTexel / s billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 68 Watt
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 1190
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 295

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 810

• 3x more core clock speed: 902 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.7x more pipelines: 2x 512 vs 384
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 24237 vs 11991

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 810

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2666 1190
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 295
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11991 24237

Compare specifications (specs)