Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 687x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 76.86 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.834 vs 55.077
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.453 vs 830.773
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.575 vs 4.132
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 5431
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1123
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 2678
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 5431
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1123
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 2678
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 10 November 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 76.86 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.834 vs 55.077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.453 vs 830.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.575 vs 4.132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 2678 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1125 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1201 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 2.7x more pipelines: 1024 vs 384
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3641 vs 2688
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 374
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17712 vs 12013
- Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 61.742
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 vs 193.592
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1125 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1201 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 1024 vs 384 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3641 vs 2688 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 634 vs 374 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17712 vs 12013 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.584 vs 61.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 225.985 vs 193.592 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2688 | 3641 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 374 | 634 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12013 | 17712 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.834 | 55.077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.453 | 830.773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.575 | 4.132 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.742 | 82.584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 193.592 | 225.985 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 2678 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 5431 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1123 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 2678 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT1 | Baffin |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 10 November 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 626 | 623 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Price now | $259.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 19.63 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1201 MHz |
Compute units | 48 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 76.86 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,460 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Width | IGP | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |