Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs Intel HD Graphics 615
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and Intel HD Graphics 615 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3492.1x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 30 August 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 615
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 615
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Intel HD Graphics 615 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | 0 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 701 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 185 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3046 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 215.572 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 11.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 18.292 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2409 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1128 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2409 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Intel HD Graphics 615 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 30 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1056 | 1477 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 5 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 403.2 gflops | |
Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR3L / LPDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |