Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and NVIDIA NVS 510 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 6902x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 12.75 GTexel / s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 35 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 23 October 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s vs 12.75 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 192 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA NVS 510
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 797 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 797 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA NVS 510
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | NVIDIA NVS 510 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 691 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 288 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1704 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.809 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 111.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.399 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.769 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 9.522 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1720 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1211 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 976 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1720 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | NVIDIA NVS 510 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Kepler |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | GK107 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 23 October 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 1427 | 1430 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 797 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | 12.75 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 306.0 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 160 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 |