Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and NVIDIA Quadro K620M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 4894.3x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 March 2015
Texture fill rate 88.00 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 30 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Name Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU NVIDIA Quadro K620M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 1243
PassMark - G3D Mark 1165
PassMark - G2D Mark 158
Geekbench - OpenCL 4583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 23.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 165.904
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 91.813
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1349

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.0 Maxwell
Code name Tiger Lake GT2 GM108
Launch date 2 Sep 2020 1 March 2015
Place in performance rating 1427 1429
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1100 MHz 1124 MHz
Compute units 80
Core clock speed 300 MHz 1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 352.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 2.816 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 1408 GFLOPS
Pipelines 640 384
Pixel fill rate 22.00 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 88.00 GTexel/s 17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 30 Watt
Floating-point performance 863.2 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-A (3.0)
Width IGP
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 2.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4 5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
nView Display Management
Optimus