Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU and NVIDIA Quadro M500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 4894.3x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 vs 27 April 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | NVIDIA Quadro M500M |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1168 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6074 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tiger Lake GT2 | GM108 |
Launch date | 2 Sep 2020 | 27 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 1083 | 1084 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 352.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.816 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1408 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.00 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.0 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |