Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 980 MHz
- 772.7x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 102.5 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 355.5x more memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 6.0 GB/s
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3285
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3285
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 16 August 2012 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 980 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 102.5 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 6.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 915 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 75% higher pipelines: 1344 vs 768
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 15375 vs 14238
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 vs 3462
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3337 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3337 vs 3214
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 468 vs 311
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4413 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1344 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15375 vs 14238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 468 vs 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4413 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 15375 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3337 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 468 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 4413 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 36.256 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1029.267 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.037 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.894 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 82.191 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1615 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Kepler |
| Code name | DG1 | GK104 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 16 August 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 523 | 701 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
| Price now | $321.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1344 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 150 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 1344 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,459.5 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 9.5" (24.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | 3-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 6.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
