Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1594 MHz
- 2.1x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 38.26 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 42% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 10706
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 3808
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 3808
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 2784
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 2784
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 228
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1594 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 38.26 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 vs 10706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 2784 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 vs 228 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX330
- 5.1x more core clock speed: 1531 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3214
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2405 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1531 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2405 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX330
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 10706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 3808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 2784 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3352 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 228 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 2405 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce MX330 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
| Code name | DG1 | GP108 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 523 | 757 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1594 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | 38.26 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.13 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | 1,224 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | 25.50 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 38.26 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
