Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 94% higher core clock speed: 200 MHz vs 103 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 4x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 20 Watt
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 371 vs 131
• Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 108 vs 58
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1798
• Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1798

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS

• Around 78% higher pipelines: 32 vs 18

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GS

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	371 131
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	108 58
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 1798
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 1798

Compare specifications (specs)