Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon HD 8280E
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon HD 8280E videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 371 vs 256
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 108 vs 81
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1458 vs 1210
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 vs 23 April 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt vs 15 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 371 vs 256 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 108 vs 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1458 vs 1210 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8280E
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 450 MHz vs 200 MHz
Core clock speed | 450 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8280E
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 605 | AMD Radeon HD 8280E |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 371 | 256 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 108 | 81 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 1458 | 1210 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.247 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 66.304 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.406 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.902 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 5.113 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1643 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1961 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 724 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1643 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1961 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 605 | AMD Radeon HD 8280E | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Gemini Lake GT1 | Kalindi |
Launch date | 11 December 2017 | 23 April 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1547 | 1549 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 450 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 18 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 5 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,178 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Memory type | DDR4 / LPDDR4 | |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |