Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.3x more pipelines: 18 vs 8
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
• 8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 371 vs 115
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 441
• 4.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 441

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS

• 2.3x more core clock speed: 459 MHz vs 200 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 111 vs 108

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	371 115
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	108 111
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 441
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 441

Compare specifications (specs)