Intel UHD Graphics 605 vs AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 605 and AMD Radeon R5 Graphics videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 605

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 3x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 15 Watt
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1643 vs 1363
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1961 vs 1915
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1643 vs 1363
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1961 vs 1915

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

• 14.2x more pipelines: 256 vs 18
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2981 vs 1458
• Around 49% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.331 vs 4.247
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 vs 52.728
• Around 74% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 vs 0.312
• 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 vs 3.355
• 10.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 vs 4.219
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 vs 724
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 vs 724

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 605
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	1458 2981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.247 6.331
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	52.728 119.568
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.312 0.543
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.355 12.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.219 42.459
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1643 1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 1915
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	724 966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1643 1363
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1961 1915

Compare specifications (specs)