Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 135 Watt
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 709 vs 555
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 71
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 11 December 2007 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 135 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 vs 555 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 vs 71 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 650 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3342 vs 1699
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3342 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3342 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3342 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 | 555 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 71 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3342 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 512 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | G92 |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 11 December 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1341 | 1340 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 135 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 754 million |
Floating-point performance | 416.0 gflops | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 41.6 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 254 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 52.5 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1640 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR3 |