Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 709 vs 266
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 175 vs 77
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2691 vs 1207
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1241 vs 930
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1241 vs 930
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1699 vs 1631
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1699 vs 1631
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 23 November 2013 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 vs 266 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 vs 77 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2691 vs 1207 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 vs 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 vs 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 vs 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 vs 1631 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 709 | 266 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | 77 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2691 | 1207 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 1631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 1631 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.197 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1322.192 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.774 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 47.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 224.569 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon HD 8400 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | Kalindi |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 23 November 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 1341 | 1342 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,178 million |
Floating-point performance | 102.4 gflops | |
Pipelines | 128 | |
Texture fill rate | 3.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Memory type | System Shared |