Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1071 vs 296
  • 3.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1071 vs 296
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1241 vs 475
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1241 vs 475
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1699 vs 657
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1699 vs 657
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 April 2018 vs 28 June 2011
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1071 vs 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1071 vs 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1241 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1241 vs 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1699 vs 657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1699 vs 657

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

  • Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1877 vs 693
  • 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 171
  • 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5696 vs 2697
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1877 vs 693
PassMark - G2D Mark 364 vs 171
Geekbench - OpenCL 5696 vs 2697

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
693
1877
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
171
364
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2697
5696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1071
296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1071
296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1241
475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1241
475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1699
657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1699
657
Name Intel UHD Graphics 610 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M
PassMark - G3D Mark 693 1877
PassMark - G2D Mark 171 364
Geekbench - OpenCL 2697 5696
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1071 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1071 296
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1241 475
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1241 475
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1699 657
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1699 657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 14.911
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 533.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.681
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 66.187

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 610 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Fermi 2.0
Code name Coffee Lake GT1 GF114
Launch date 3 April 2018 28 June 2011
Place in performance rating 1350 1353
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz 575 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,950 million
CUDA cores 336
Floating-point performance 772.8 gflops
Pipelines 336
Texture fill rate 32.2 billion / sec

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Laptop size large
SLI options 2-way
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB
Memory bandwidth 72.0 GB / s
Memory bus width 192 Bit
Memory clock speed 1500 MHz
Memory type GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus
SLI