Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 63% higher boost clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 645 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 32 Watt
Launch date 3 April 2018 vs 22 March 2012
Boost clock speed 1050 MHz vs 645 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 32 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

  • Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 931 vs 693
  • Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 204 vs 171
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3186 vs 2697
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1476 vs 1071
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1476 vs 1071
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1963 vs 1241
  • Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1963 vs 1241
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2580 vs 1699
  • Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2580 vs 1699
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 931 vs 693
PassMark - G2D Mark 204 vs 171
Geekbench - OpenCL 3186 vs 2697
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1476 vs 1071
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1476 vs 1071
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1963 vs 1241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1963 vs 1241
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2580 vs 1699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2580 vs 1699

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
693
931
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
171
204
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2697
3186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1071
1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1071
1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1241
1963
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1241
1963
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1699
2580
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1699
2580
Name Intel UHD Graphics 610 NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
PassMark - G3D Mark 693 931
PassMark - G2D Mark 171 204
Geekbench - OpenCL 2697 3186
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1071 1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1071 1476
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1241 1963
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1241 1963
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1699 2580
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1699 2580
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.861
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 275.972
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.727
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 15.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 17.381

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 610 NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Kepler
Code name Coffee Lake GT1 GK107
Launch date 3 April 2018 22 March 2012
Place in performance rating 1350 1352
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1050 MHz 645 MHz
Core clock speed 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 32 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1,270 million
CUDA cores 384
Floating-point performance 480.0 gflops
Pipelines 384

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus support PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size medium sized

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12 API
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
OpenCL 1.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bus width 128bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3\GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Blu-Ray
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectCompute
DirectX 11 DirectX 11
Optimus