Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 18 May 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
- 3x more core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1306 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 26.7x more pipelines: 640 vs 24
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.997 vs 27.517
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 726.846 vs 354.254
- Around 90% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.442 vs 1.807
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.991 vs 20.323
- 5.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 155.196 vs 29.327
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 24 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.997 vs 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 726.846 vs 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.442 vs 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.991 vs 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 155.196 vs 29.327 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1239 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 300 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4653 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 41.997 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 726.846 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 3.442 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 30.991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 155.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GRID M3-3020 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GM107 |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 18 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 1246 | 1247 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 1,672 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 640 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 52.24 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 630 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIAll-In-Wonder Radeon 8500DV
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 LE
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGRID M3-3020
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
