Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs ATI Radeon 9200 LE
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and ATI Radeon 9200 LE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 14 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 40% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 250 MHz
- 28.8x more texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 28 Watt
- 413.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1241 vs 3
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 128
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 1 May 2003 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz vs 250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 1 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 150 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 28 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1241 vs 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 vs 128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: ATI Radeon 9200 LE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ATI Radeon 9200 LE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1241 | 3 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 301 | 128 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4646 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.491 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 340.911 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.785 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.514 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 420 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ATI Radeon 9200 LE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Rage 7 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | RV280 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 1 May 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 1241 | 1240 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 250 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 36 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | AGP 8x |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 1.4 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |