Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce 840M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1124 MHz
• Around 60% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
• Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1239 vs 1096
• Around 99% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 300 vs 151
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 22.848
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 162.594
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.237
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 3191
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 3191

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 840M

• 2.9x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 350 MHz
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• Around 87% better floating-point performance: 863.2 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
• Around 23% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5745 vs 4653
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 vs 20.323
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 vs 29.327
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 vs 1870
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 vs 1596
• Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 vs 1870
• Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 vs 1596
• 7.4x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 503 vs 68

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1239 1096
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	300 151
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4653 5745
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	27.517 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	354.254 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.807 1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.323 21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.327 95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1870 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1596 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 3191
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	68 503

Compare specifications (specs)