Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 24.29 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 29 November 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 24.29 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
- Around 58% higher core clock speed: 552 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 84% better floating-point performance: 847.9 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
Core clock speed | 552 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
Floating-point performance | 847.9 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | GF110 |
Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 29 November 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1234 | not rated |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 552 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | 847.9 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 24.29 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 3208 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |