Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 6550D

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 6550D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
  • 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 401
  • 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 131
  • 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 1316
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1382
  • Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1382
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 September 2017 vs 30 June 2011
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 32 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1237 vs 401
PassMark - G2D Mark 299 vs 131
Geekbench - OpenCL 4657 vs 1316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 vs 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 vs 1382

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6550D

  • Around 71% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 16.7x more pipelines: 400 vs 24
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1975 vs 1596
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1975 vs 1596
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 600 MHz vs 350 MHz
Pipelines 400 vs 24
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1975 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3324 vs 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1975 vs 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3324 vs 3309

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6550D

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1237
401
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
299
131
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
4657
1316
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1870
1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1596
1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3309
3324
Name Intel UHD Graphics 630 AMD Radeon HD 6550D
PassMark - G3D Mark 1237 401
PassMark - G2D Mark 299 131
Geekbench - OpenCL 4657 1316
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1870 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1596 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3309 3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1870 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1596 1975
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3309 3324
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 68

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 630 AMD Radeon HD 6550D

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 Terascale 2
Code name Coffee Lake GT2 Llano
Launch date 1 September 2017 30 June 2011
Place in performance rating 1234 1237
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 350 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 460.8 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 32 nm
Pipelines 24 400
Texture fill rate 28.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt
Transistor count 189 million 1000 Million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Shared memory 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync