Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon HD 6550D
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 630 and AMD Radeon HD 6550D videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 401
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 131
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 1316
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1382
- Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1382
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 vs 30 June 2011 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 vs 401 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 vs 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 vs 1316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 1382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 1382 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6550D
- Around 71% higher core clock speed: 600 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16.7x more pipelines: 400 vs 24
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1975 vs 1596
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1975 vs 1596
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 400 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1975 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1975 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 3309 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6550D
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6550D |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 401 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 1316 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1975 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1382 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1975 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3324 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon HD 6550D | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT2 | Llano |
| Launch date | 1 September 2017 | 30 June 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 1234 | 1237 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 400 |
| Texture fill rate | 28.8 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 1000 Million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Shared memory | 1 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||

