Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD FirePro S7150
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD FirePro S7150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 132.7x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 117.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 4359
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 583
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 4359
- 5.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 583
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 1 February 2016 |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 117.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 583 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro S7150
- 3.5x more core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 9.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 192
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3770 vs 1591
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 414 vs 401
- 4.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27141 vs 5953
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6147 vs 2429
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6147 vs 2429
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3770 vs 1591 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 414 vs 401 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27141 vs 5953 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6147 vs 2429 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6147 vs 2429 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD FirePro S7150
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD FirePro S7150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | 3770 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 | 414 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5953 | 27141 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 583 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 6147 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 4359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 583 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.544 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 570.969 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.687 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 23.637 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD FirePro S7150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Tonga |
Launch date | 2021 | 1 February 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 657 | 658 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Compute units | 24 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 192 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 117.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |