NVIDIA T500 Mobile vs Intel UHD Graphics 730
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T500 Mobile and Intel UHD Graphics 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T500 Mobile
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 6.1x more texture fill rate: 94.92 GTexel/s vs 15.60 GTexel/s
- 4.7x more pipelines: 896 vs 192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5095 vs 2429
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5095 vs 2429
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3309
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3309
- 4.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 28309 vs 5953
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s vs 15.60 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 896 vs 192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 vs 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 vs 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3309 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28309 vs 5953 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3199
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3199
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 2 Dec 2020 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 18 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 3199 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 3199 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T500 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 730
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T500 Mobile | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5095 | 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5095 | 2429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3199 | 5221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3199 | 5221 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | 3309 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 28309 | 5953 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1591 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 401 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T500 Mobile | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Generation 12.1 |
| Code name | TU117 | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Launch date | 2 Dec 2020 | 2021 |
| Place in performance rating | 656 | 657 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1365 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 94.92 GFLOPS (1:32) | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.075 TFLOPS (2:1) | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.037 TFLOPS | 499.2 GFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 896 | 192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 54.24 GPixel/s | 10.40 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 94.92 GTexel/s | 15.60 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | |
| Compute units | 24 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T500 Mobile with others
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 280 PCI
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X600 XT
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
ATIFireMV 2200
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro S7150
NVIDIAT500 Mobile vs
IntelUHD Graphics 730
