Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• 253.2x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 61.6 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 85 Watt
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 971
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1980
• 5.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 971
• Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1980

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

• 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 4.7x more pipelines: 896 vs 192
• Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3048 vs 1594
• Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 508 vs 405

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 260 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1594 3048
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	405 508
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5221 971
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1980
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5221 971
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1980

Compare specifications (specs)