Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730

• Videocard is newer: launch date 17 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2437.5x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 192 vs 120
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
• 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 5.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1590 vs 283
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 371
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 3695
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 1701
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 3695
• Around 95% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 1701

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

• 2.7x more core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1590 283
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	406 371
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5221 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5221 3695
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3309 1701

Compare specifications (specs)