Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA Quadro P600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 595.6x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 40 Watt
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3359
- 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3359
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 7 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 34.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 40 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 vs 3359 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600
- 4.4x more core clock speed: 1329 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3271 vs 1737
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 472 vs 348
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11181 vs 6684
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4662 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3219
- Around 61% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4662 vs 2899
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3219
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1329 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3271 vs 1737 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 vs 348 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11181 vs 6684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4662 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3219 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4662 vs 2899 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3219 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1737 | 3271 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | 472 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6684 | 11181 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | 4662 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.134 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 141.164 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | NVIDIA Quadro P600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GP107 |
Launch date | 2021 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 596 | 597 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $178 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 22.11 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1557 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1329 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 34.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 40 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,117 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 64.19 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |