Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1392 MHz
- 347.2x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 843.503
- Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 vs 24.676
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 vs 25 October 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 1392 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 vs 24.676 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- 4.6x more core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 768 vs 256
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 532
- 3.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 1908
- 2.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 7628
- Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 46.442
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 2.846
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 94.384
- 4.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 305 vs 72
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 650 vs 532 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6332 vs 1908 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 vs 7628 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 46.442 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 vs 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 94.384 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 vs 72 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 532 | 650 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1908 | 6332 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7628 | 20732 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 75.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 5.071 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 24.676 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 301.168 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 72 | 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Pascal |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | GP107 |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 | 25 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 832 | 487 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 GTexel/s | 66.82 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 75 Watt |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |