Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 528.2x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 14.6x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 219 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 vs 36.499
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 708.853
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 vs 36.208
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 vs 7 December 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 GTexel/s vs 43.92 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 219 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 vs 36.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 vs 708.853 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 vs 36.208 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 732 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 480 vs 256
- Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.967 vs 2.846
- Around 31% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 123.354 vs 94.384
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 732 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 480 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.967 vs 2.846 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 123.354 vs 94.384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7628 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 36.499 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 708.853 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 3.967 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 36.208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 123.354 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 72 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5405 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5405 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Rev. 2 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | GF110 |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 | 7 December 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 819 | 818 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 732 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 GTexel/s | 43.92 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 219 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,405 gflops | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 320 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3800 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |