Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1219 MHz
- 594.7x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 507 vs 390
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1896 vs 1841
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 vs 30.848
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 438.581
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.846 vs 2.268
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 vs 12 June 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz vs 1219 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 vs 390 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1896 vs 1841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 vs 30.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 vs 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 vs 2.268 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10208 vs 7653
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 40.941
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 94.384
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 512 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10208 vs 7653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 46.988 vs 40.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 139.235 vs 94.384 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 507 | 390 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1896 | 1841 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7653 | 10208 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 30.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 438.581 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 2.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 46.988 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 139.235 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 738 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3241 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 770 | AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | Lexa |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 | 12 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 829 | 831 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 GTexel/s | 39.01 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,248 gflops | |
Transistor count | 2,200 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 56 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |