Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 4 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1450 MHz vs 1219 MHz
  • 594.7x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
  • Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 507 vs 390
  • Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1896 vs 1841
  • Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 vs 30.848
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 438.581
  • Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.846 vs 2.268
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 Nov 2021 vs 12 June 2017
Boost clock speed 1450 MHz vs 1219 MHz
Texture fill rate 23.20 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 507 vs 390
PassMark - G3D Mark 1896 vs 1841
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.442 vs 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1011.7 vs 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.846 vs 2.268

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

  • 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • 2x more pipelines: 512 vs 256
  • Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10208 vs 7653
  • Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 46.988 vs 40.941
  • Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 139.235 vs 94.384
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 512 vs 256
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 10208 vs 7653
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 46.988 vs 40.941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 139.235 vs 94.384

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
507
390
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1896
1841
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7653
10208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
46.442
30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1011.7
438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.846
2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
40.941
46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
94.384
139.235
Name Intel UHD Graphics 770 AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
PassMark - G2D Mark 507 390
PassMark - G3D Mark 1896 1841
Geekbench - OpenCL 7653 10208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.442 30.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1011.7 438.581
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.846 2.268
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.941 46.988
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.384 139.235
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 738
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 3241
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3709
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 770 AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.2 GCN 4.0
Code name Alder Lake GT1 Lexa
Launch date 4 Nov 2021 12 June 2017
Place in performance rating 829 831
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $149

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1450 MHz 1219 MHz
Compute units 32
Core clock speed 300 MHz 925 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1485 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 742.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 256 512
Pixel fill rate 11.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 23.20 GTexel/s 39.01 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt
Floating-point performance 1,248 gflops
Transistor count 2,200 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 56 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 7000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5