Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 440.2x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 40 nm
- 11.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 434
- Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 vs 31.935
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 539.966
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.846 vs 2.344
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 vs 35.841
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.384 vs 64.308
- Around 90% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 739 vs 389
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 vs 25 January 2011 |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 GTexel/s vs 52.7 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 vs 31.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 vs 539.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 vs 2.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 vs 35.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 vs 64.308 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 739 vs 389 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 823 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3057 vs 1914
- Around 41% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10724 vs 7627
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 vs 256 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3057 vs 1914 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10724 vs 7627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 434 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1914 | 3057 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7627 | 10724 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 46.442 | 31.935 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1011.7 | 539.966 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.846 | 2.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.941 | 35.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 94.384 | 64.308 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 739 | 389 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3333 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4184 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3333 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 770 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.2 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Alder Lake GT1 | GF114 |
Launch date | 4 Nov 2021 | 25 January 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 811 | 814 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $249 | |
Price now | $138 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.88 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 823 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1485 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 742.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 11.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.20 GTexel/s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 170 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 1,263.4 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.3 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |