Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 17 May 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 937 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 12x more pipelines: 384 vs 32
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4330 vs 1887
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4330 vs 1887
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3505
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3505
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 937 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 32 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4330 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4330 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 vs 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 vs 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3352 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 4330 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2277 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 215 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 45.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 994 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Pascal |
| Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GP108 |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 17 May 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 884 | 905 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1038 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 937 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 46.98 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 256 DDR
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X700
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7950 GT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAP106-090
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
